State v. Smith

623 So. 2d 1311, 1993 La. LEXIS 2481, 1993 WL 350682
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Smith. Read the opinion of the Court — 577 So. 2d 48
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided September 9, 1993·No. No. 93-KD-2227·Published

Opinion

In re Smith, Clarence M.; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “C”, No. 298-874.

Granted. Judgment of the trial court denying relator’s request for a hearing on the admissibility of co-conspirator statements and permitting the introduction of co-conspirator statements is vacated and set aside. The trial judge is ordered either 1) to conduct a pre-trial hearing at which the defense should be allowed an opportunity to present new or additional evidence or 2) to delay his ruling on the admissibility of alleged co-conspirator statements until the state’s prima facie evidence of conspiracy is presented at trial.

HALL, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Smith, 623 So. 2d 1311, 1993 La. LEXIS 2481, 1993 WL 350682 (La. 1993).

623 So. 2d 1311 (State v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.