State v. Smith

604 So. 2d 995, 1992 La. LEXIS 2794
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Smith. Read the opinion of the Court — 554 So. 2d 676
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided September 25, 1992·No. No. 92-K-0695·Published

Opinion

In re State of Louisiana; — Plaintiff(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 90KA-1236; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “D”, No. 326-873.

Denied; result correct. The trial court erred in granting the state’s motion in li-mine to prevent the defendants from cross-examining witness Thornton with regard to the pending charges against him and any expectation of leniency from the state he may have had in return for his cooperation and testimony. State v. Rankin, 465 So.2d 679 (La.1985); State v. Brady, 381 So.2d 819 (La.1980). The trial court’s error was not harmless beyond a reasonable doubt in light of the witness’s importance to the state’s case and the conflicting testimony he gave as the case moved from its pretrial stages to trial. See Delaware v. Van Arsdall, 475 U.S. 673, 106 S.Ct. 1431, 89 L.Ed.2d 674 (1986).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Smith, 604 So. 2d 995, 1992 La. LEXIS 2794 (La. 1992).

604 So. 2d 995 (State v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Delaware v. Van Arsdall
475 U.S. 673 (Supreme Court, 1986)
State v. Rankin
465 So. 2d 679 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1985)
State v. Brady
381 So. 2d 819 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1980)