State v. Smith

519 So. 2d 770, 1988 La. LEXIS 240, 1988 WL 7438
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Smith. Read the opinion of the Court — 475 So. 2d 331
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided February 5, 1988·No. No. 87-KK-2791·Published

Opinion

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI

PER CURIAM.

Writ granted. The trial court is ordered to conduct a full hearing and to take any additional evidence necessary to determine possible conflicts of interest in attorney Dwight Doskey’s representation of Earl Smith, III.

It is further ordered that the trial court is to fully inform defendant of the dangers of any possible conflicts of interest, to determine on the record that defendant understands and consents to any conflicts, and to thereafter rule on the motion to recuse. See State v. Morrow, 440 So.2d 98 (La.1983).

DIXON, C.J., dissents, believing that the Court of Appeal and the district court should be reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Smith, 519 So. 2d 770, 1988 La. LEXIS 240, 1988 WL 7438 (La. 1988).

519 So. 2d 770 (State v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Morrow
440 So. 2d 98 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1983)