State v. Smith

Supreme Court of Iowa

State v. Smith

88 Iowa 721

CourtSupreme Court of Iowa

DecidedFebruary 3, 1893

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 88 Iowa 721 (State v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Smith, 88 Iowa 721 (iowa 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

Kinne, J.

The defendant was convicted of the crime of resisting an officer. The defendant excepted to the instructions of the court, and to the action of the court in overruling his motion for a new trial. Judgment was entered against the defendant. The cause is submitted on a partial transcript of the record, and without briefs or arguments. The instructions and motion for a new trial do not appear in the record, and hence we are unable to determine that the court below erred in his rulings. An examination of the record, so far as it is before us, discloses no error. The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kinne, J.

The defendant was convicted of the crime of resisting an officer. The defendant excepted to the instructions of the court, and to the action of the court in overruling his motion for a new trial. Judgment was entered against the defendant. The cause is submitted on a partial transcript of the record, and without briefs or arguments. The instructions and motion for a new trial do not appear in the record, and hence we are unable to determine that the court below erred in his rulings. An examination of the record, so far as it is before us, discloses no error. The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

88 Iowa 721, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-smith-iowa-1893.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack