State v. Smith

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Smith

541 So. 2d 1224, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 336, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 425, 1989 WL 6229

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 31, 1989

DocketNo. 88-2064

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 541 So. 2d 1224 (State v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Smith, 541 So. 2d 1224, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 336, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 425, 1989 WL 6229 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the state from a sentence which departs downwards from the sentencing guidelines. The defendant concedes that the sentence under review must be reversed because the trial court gave no written reasons for departing from the sentencing guidelines, and that the cause must be remanded for the entry of such written reasons. We agree. State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla.1985); State v. Vickery, 536 So.2d 380 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); State v. Wayda, 533 So.2d 939 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); State v. McDavid, 532 So. 2d 1125 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); State v. Adams, 528 So.2d 548 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); State v. Frederick, 525 So.2d 491 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); State v. Wilson, 523 So.2d 178 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Daughtry v. State, 521 So.2d 208 (Fla. 2d DCA), rev. denied, 528 So.2d 1181 (Fla.1988).

The sentence under review is therefore reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court with directions to: (1) provide written reasons for the subject sentencing guidelines departure, or (2) sentence the defendant within the sentencing guidelines.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the state from a sentence which departs downwards from the sentencing guidelines. The defendant concedes that the sentence under review must be reversed because the trial court gave no written reasons for departing from the sentencing guidelines, and that the cause must be remanded for the entry of such written reasons. We agree. State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla.1985); State v. Vickery, 536 So.2d 380 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); State v. Wayda, 533 So.2d 939 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); State v. McDavid, 532 So. 2d 1125 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); State v. Adams, 528 So.2d 548 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); State v. Frederick, 525 So.2d 491 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); State v. Wilson, 523 So.2d 178 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Daughtry v. State, 521 So.2d 208 (Fla. 2d DCA), rev. denied, 528 So.2d 1181 (Fla.1988).

The sentence under review is therefore reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court with directions to: (1) provide written reasons for the subject sentencing guidelines departure, or (2) sentence the defendant within the sentencing guidelines.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

541 So. 2d 1224, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 336, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 425, 1989 WL 6229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-smith-fladistctapp-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack