State v. Smith

861 A.2d 1178, 271 Conn. 945, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 514
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided November 10, 2004·No. SC 17309·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 85 Conn. App. 96 (AC 23414), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly reverse the judgment of conviction based upon the trial court’s failure to hold an evidentiary hearing pursuant to General Statutes § 54-86f?

“2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that General Statutes § 54-86f (1) requires that a defendant be permitted to introduce evidence of any semen that is found on the victim?

“3. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that a defendant whose defense is misidentification must be permitted to present evidence of semen from a third party without having to first show the relevance of that semen to the sexual assault?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Smith, 861 A.2d 1178, 271 Conn. 945, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 514 (Colo. 2004).

861 A.2d 1178 (State v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Smith
907 A.2d 73 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2006)