State v. Smith

783 A.2d 1032, 258 Conn. 930, 2001 Conn. LEXIS 456

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided October 10, 2001·No. SC 16606·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 65 Conn. App. 126 (AC 20829), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court was not required to instruct the jury on the lesser included offense of manslaughter in the first degree?”

James B. Streeto, deputy assistant public defender, in support of the petition. Susann E. Gill, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided October 10, 2001

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 65 Conn. App. 126 (AC 20829), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court was not required to instruct the jury on the lesser included offense of manslaughter in the first degree?”

James B. Streeto, deputy assistant public defender, in support of the petition. Susann E. Gill, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided October 10, 2001

State v. Smith, 783 A.2d 1032, 258 Conn. 930, 2001 Conn. LEXIS 456 (Colo. 2001).

Pincite

783 A.2d 1032 (State v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

State v. Smith

815 A.2d 1216 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2003)

Opinion

Related