State v. Smiley

411 S.W.3d 834, 2013 WL 5913984, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1217
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 15, 2013·No. No. WD 75595·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dale Smiley appeals his convictions following a jury trial for second-degree statutory sodomy, sexual abuse, sexual [835] misconduct involving a child by indecent exposure, and two counts of second-degree sexual misconduct and consecutive sentences totaling fifteen years imprisonment. He contends that the trial court plainly erred in failing sua sponte to declare a mistrial or give a curative instruction during the State’s closing argument. After Smiley filed this appeal, he filed a motion to remand the case to the trial court to consider newly discovered evidence, which was taken with the case. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The motion to remand is denied.

The convictions are affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Smiley, 411 S.W.3d 834, 2013 WL 5913984, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1217 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

411 S.W.3d 834 (State v. Smiley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.