State v. Smigelski

61 A.2d 583, 1 N.J. 31, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 375
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 18, 1948·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appellant seeks to quash the indictment or in the alternative to transfer it to the Juvenile and Domestic *32 Relations Court of Hudson County. The appeal must be dismissed because the record shows no final judgment in the Supreme Court but merely a dismissal of the writ in question. State v. Ireland, 127 N. J. Law 558 (E. & A. 1942).

However, we examined the case upon its merits and have concluded that it is controlled by In re Mei, 122 N. J. Eq. 12S (E.&A.1937).

The appeal is dismissed.

For dismissal: Chief Justice Vanderbilt and Justices Case, Hei-ier, Oliphant, Wacheneeld, Burling, and Aokerson—7.

Opposed: None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Smigelski, 61 A.2d 583, 1 N.J. 31, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 375 (N.J. 1948).

61 A.2d 583 (State v. Smigelski) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Smigelski's Petition
185 F. Supp. 283 (D. New Jersey, 1960)
State v. Monahan
104 A.2d 21 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1954)
State v. Maier
99 A.2d 21 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1953)