State v. Sloss
This text of 1 So. 3d 164 (State v. Sloss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We have for review Sloss v. State, 965 So.2d 1204 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007), in which the Fifth District Court of Appeal certified a question of great public importance. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.
We stayed proceedings in this case pending our disposition of Martinez v. *165 State, 981 So.2d 449 (Fla.2008). When our decision in Martinez became final, we issued an order directing respondent to show cause why we should not exercise jurisdiction, quash the Sloss decision, and remand for reconsideration in light of our decision in Martinez. Respondent has conceded that Martinez controls the outcome of the instant case, and petitioner agrees.
Accordingly, we grant the petition for review in the present case. The decision under review is quashed, and this matter is remanded to the Fifth District Court of Appeal for reconsideration upon application of this Court’s decision in Martinez.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 So. 3d 164, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 36, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 8, 2009 WL 88541, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-sloss-fla-2009.