State v. Sleuterbeck

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Sleuterbeck

89 Ohio St. (N.S.) 472

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 17, 1914

DocketNo. 14272

StatusPublished

This text of 89 Ohio St. (N.S.) 472 (State v. Sleuterbeck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Sleuterbeck, 89 Ohio St. (N.S.) 472 (Ohio 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment affirmed. Grounds stated in journal entry:

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the part of the judgment of the court of appeals reversing the judgment of the common pleas court on the weight of the evidence be, and the same is hereby, affirmed, and that part of the judgment of the court of appeals discharging the defendant in error, is hereby reversed, and the court coming now [473]*473to render the judgment in that behalf that the court of appeals should have rendered, it is ordered and adjudged that said defendant in error, Samuel Sleuterbeck, be remanded to the custody of the common pleas court, and that this cause be remanded to that court for further trial and proceedings according to law.

Nichols, C. J., Johnson, Donahue, Wanamaicer, Newman and Wilkin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment affirmed. Grounds stated in journal entry:

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the part of the judgment of the court of appeals reversing the judgment of the common pleas court on the weight of the evidence be, and the same is hereby, affirmed, and that part of the judgment of the court of appeals discharging the defendant in error, is hereby reversed, and the court coming now [473]*473to render the judgment in that behalf that the court of appeals should have rendered, it is ordered and adjudged that said defendant in error, Samuel Sleuterbeck, be remanded to the custody of the common pleas court, and that this cause be remanded to that court for further trial and proceedings according to law.

Nichols, C. J., Johnson, Donahue, Wanamaicer, Newman and Wilkin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

89 Ohio St. (N.S.) 472, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-sleuterbeck-ohio-1914.