State v. Slater

912 A.2d 484, 280 Conn. 950, 2006 Conn. LEXIS 496
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided December 15, 2006·No. SC 17794·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 98 Conn. App. 288 (AC 26356), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the victim’s statements to civilian bystanders were not testimonial under the confrontation clause?

“2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the victim’s statements to medical personnel were not testimonial under the confrontation clause?

“3. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the failure to give an instruction on the jailhouse informant was harmless?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Slater, 912 A.2d 484, 280 Conn. 950, 2006 Conn. LEXIS 496 (Colo. 2006).

912 A.2d 484 (State v. Slater) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Slater
939 A.2d 1105 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2008)