State v. Skutnick

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Skutnick

524 S.W.3d 542, 2017 WL 3136302, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 723

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 25, 2017

DocketWD 79656

StatusPublished

This text of 524 S.W.3d 542 (State v. Skutnick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Skutnick, 524 S.W.3d 542, 2017 WL 3136302, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 723 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Order

Per Curiam

Andrew Skutnick was convicted of two counts of first-degree statutory sodomy, one count of attempted statutory sodomy, and first-degree child molestation during a jury trial. On appeal, he contends the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions because the victim did not identify him in court as the perpetrator of the crimes. For reasons explained iii Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the circuit court’s judgment of conviction.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

Per Curiam

Andrew Skutnick was convicted of two counts of first-degree statutory sodomy, one count of attempted statutory sodomy, and first-degree child molestation during a jury trial. On appeal, he contends the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions because the victim did not identify him in court as the perpetrator of the crimes. For reasons explained iii Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the circuit court’s judgment of conviction.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

524 S.W.3d 542, 2017 WL 3136302, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 723, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-skutnick-moctapp-2017.