State v. Skjervem

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Skjervem

459 P.3d 965, 303 Or. App. 157

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedMarch 18, 2020

DocketA168288

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 459 P.3d 965 (State v. Skjervem) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Skjervem, 459 P.3d 965, 303 Or. App. 157 (Or. Ct. App. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

Submitted February 28; portion of judgment requiring defendant to pay attorney fees reversed, otherwise affirmed March 18; petition for review denied June 18, 2020 (366 Or 569)

STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. KRISTIAN HELMER SKJERVEM, Defendant-Appellant. Clackamas County Circuit Court 17CR79641; A168288 459 P3d 965

Katherine E. Weber, Judge. Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Eric Johansen, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Dashiell L. Farewell, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before Armstrong, Presiding Judge, and Tookey, Judge, and Aoyagi, Judge. PER CURIAM Portion of judgment requiring defendant to pay attorney fees reversed; otherwise affirmed. 158 State v. Skjervem

PER CURIAM Defendant was convicted of first-degree burglary, ORS 164.225, fourth-degree assault constituting domestic violence, ORS 163.160, interference with making a report, ORS 165.572, and harassment, ORS 166.065. On appeal, he argues that the trial court plainly erred with respect to its sentence on the burglary conviction because it failed to make findings under ORS 137.750, and plainly erred in imposing $455 in attorney fees without determining whether defen- dant is or may be able to pay such fees. We reject defendant’s argument concerning ORS 137.750 without discussion. As to the attorney fee issue, the state concedes that, on this record, the trial court’s imposition of attorney fees consti- tuted plain error under our case law. We agree and accept that concession. For the reasons stated in State v. Harris, 293 Or App 110, 111, 426 P3d 252 (2018), we exercise our discretion to correct that error. Portion of judgment requiring defendant to pay attorney fees reversed; otherwise affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Submitted February 28; portion of judgment requiring defendant to pay attorney fees reversed, otherwise affirmed March 18; petition for review denied June 18, 2020 (366 Or 569)

STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. KRISTIAN HELMER SKJERVEM, Defendant-Appellant. Clackamas County Circuit Court 17CR79641; A168288 459 P3d 965

Katherine E. Weber, Judge. Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Eric Johansen, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Dashiell L. Farewell, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before Armstrong, Presiding Judge, and Tookey, Judge, and Aoyagi, Judge. PER CURIAM Portion of judgment requiring defendant to pay attorney fees reversed; otherwise affirmed. 158 State v. Skjervem

PER CURIAM Defendant was convicted of first-degree burglary, ORS 164.225, fourth-degree assault constituting domestic violence, ORS 163.160, interference with making a report, ORS 165.572, and harassment, ORS 166.065. On appeal, he argues that the trial court plainly erred with respect to its sentence on the burglary conviction because it failed to make findings under ORS 137.750, and plainly erred in imposing $455 in attorney fees without determining whether defen- dant is or may be able to pay such fees. We reject defendant’s argument concerning ORS 137.750 without discussion. As to the attorney fee issue, the state concedes that, on this record, the trial court’s imposition of attorney fees consti- tuted plain error under our case law. We agree and accept that concession. For the reasons stated in State v. Harris, 293 Or App 110, 111, 426 P3d 252 (2018), we exercise our discretion to correct that error. Portion of judgment requiring defendant to pay attorney fees reversed; otherwise affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

459 P.3d 965, 303 Or. App. 157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-skjervem-orctapp-2020.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack