State v. Skimmerhorn

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Skimmerhorn

840 N.E.2d 1077, 108 Ohio St. 3d 103

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 1, 2006·No. Nos. 2005-1857 and 2005-1911·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.

{¶ 2} The certification of conflict is accepted.

{¶ 3} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of State v. Edwards, 107 Ohio St.3d 169, 2005-Ohio-6180, 837 N.E.2d 752, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent therewith.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.

{¶ 2} The certification of conflict is accepted.

{¶ 3} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of State v. Edwards, 107 Ohio St.3d 169, 2005-Ohio-6180, 837 N.E.2d 752, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent therewith.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.

State v. Skimmerhorn, 840 N.E.2d 1077, 108 Ohio St. 3d 103 (Ohio 2006).

Pincite

840 N.E.2d 1077 (State v. Skimmerhorn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related