State v. Sitton

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Sitton

214 S.W.3d 404, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 292, 2007 WL 509427

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 20, 2007·No. No. ED 87444·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

William J. Sitton (Appellant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment of conviction entered upon the jury’s verdict finding Appellant guilty of first-degree involuntary manslaughter and armed criminal action. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not plainly err, and no manifest injustice or a miscarriage of justice occurred. State v. Norman, 178 S.W.3d 556, 560 (Mo.App. W.D.2005). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

William J. Sitton (Appellant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment of conviction entered upon the jury’s verdict finding Appellant guilty of first-degree involuntary manslaughter and armed criminal action. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not plainly err, and no manifest injustice or a miscarriage of justice occurred. State v. Norman, 178 S.W.3d 556, 560 (Mo.App. W.D.2005). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

State v. Sitton, 214 S.W.3d 404, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 292, 2007 WL 509427 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

214 S.W.3d 404 (State v. Sitton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related