State v. Singleton

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Singleton

544 S.W.3d 328

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 24, 2018

DocketWD 79741

StatusPublished

This text of 544 S.W.3d 328 (State v. Singleton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Singleton, 544 S.W.3d 328 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Michael Singleton appeals, following a jury trial, his conviction of class B misdemeanor trespass in the first degree (§ 569.140), for which he was sentenced to *329six months in the county jail. Singleton raises a single claim on appeal; he argues that the trial court erred in admitting, at trial, a written statement he made to law enforcement that the trial court previously ruled inadmissible, at a suppression hearing, due to a Miranda violation. Because Singleton fails to demonstrate either error or prejudice, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

Michael Singleton appeals, following a jury trial, his conviction of class B misdemeanor trespass in the first degree (§ 569.140), for which he was sentenced to *329six months in the county jail. Singleton raises a single claim on appeal; he argues that the trial court erred in admitting, at trial, a written statement he made to law enforcement that the trial court previously ruled inadmissible, at a suppression hearing, due to a Miranda violation. Because Singleton fails to demonstrate either error or prejudice, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

544 S.W.3d 328, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-singleton-moctapp-2018.