State v. Singleton

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Singleton

847 A.2d 312, 268 Conn. 915, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 145

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided March 24, 2004·No. SC 17156·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Corut, 81 Conn. App. 409 (AC 22906), is granted, limited to the following issue:

[916] Decided March 24, 2004 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17156. Toni M. Smith-Rosario, assistant state’s attorney, and Prolog K. Das, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition. Kirstin B. Coffin, special public defender, in opposition.

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the state did not meet its burden of persuasion that the defendant had violated the terms of his probation?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Corut, 81 Conn. App. 409 (AC 22906), is granted, limited to the following issue:

[916] Decided March 24, 2004 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17156. Toni M. Smith-Rosario, assistant state’s attorney, and Prolog K. Das, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition. Kirstin B. Coffin, special public defender, in opposition.

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the state did not meet its burden of persuasion that the defendant had violated the terms of his probation?”

State v. Singleton, 847 A.2d 312, 268 Conn. 915, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 145 (Colo. 2004).

Pincite

847 A.2d 312 (State v. Singleton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related