State v. Singh

767 A.2d 1214, 255 Conn. 935, 2001 Conn. LEXIS 50, 2001 WL 197401
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedFebruary 7, 2001
DocketSC 16476
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 767 A.2d 1214 (State v. Singh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Singh, 767 A.2d 1214, 255 Conn. 935, 2001 Conn. LEXIS 50, 2001 WL 197401 (Colo. 2001).

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 59 Conn. App. 638 (AC 19243), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the prosecutor’s cross-examination of the defendant and his closing argument to the jury constitute prosecutorial misconduct in violation of the defendant’s federal constitutional right to a fair trial?”

[936]*936The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16476. Jeremiah Donovan, in support of the petition. Mitchell S. Brody, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided February 7, 2001

VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Singh
793 A.2d 226 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
767 A.2d 1214, 255 Conn. 935, 2001 Conn. LEXIS 50, 2001 WL 197401, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-singh-conn-2001.