State v. Singh

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Singh

767 A.2d 1214, 255 Conn. 935, 2001 Conn. LEXIS 50, 2001 WL 197401

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided February 7, 2001·No. SC 16476·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 59 Conn. App. 638 (AC 19243), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the prosecutor’s cross-examination of the defendant and his closing argument to the jury constitute prosecutorial misconduct in violation of the defendant’s federal constitutional right to a fair trial?”

[936] The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16476. Jeremiah Donovan, in support of the petition. Mitchell S. Brody, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided February 7, 2001

VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 59 Conn. App. 638 (AC 19243), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the prosecutor’s cross-examination of the defendant and his closing argument to the jury constitute prosecutorial misconduct in violation of the defendant’s federal constitutional right to a fair trial?”

[936] The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16476. Jeremiah Donovan, in support of the petition. Mitchell S. Brody, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided February 7, 2001

VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

State v. Singh, 767 A.2d 1214, 255 Conn. 935, 2001 Conn. LEXIS 50, 2001 WL 197401 (Colo. 2001).

Pincite

767 A.2d 1214 (State v. Singh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related