State v. Sinden

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Sinden

552 S.W.3d 665

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 27, 2018·No. WD 80248·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

*666Roy Wayne Sinden ("Sinden") appeals his conviction for driving while intoxicated under 577.010, alleging in his sole point that the evidence was insufficient to establish that he "operated" a motor vehicle while intoxicated. The trial court's judgment is affirmed. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law has been provided to the parties. Missouri Supreme Court Rule 30.25(b)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

*666Roy Wayne Sinden ("Sinden") appeals his conviction for driving while intoxicated under 577.010, alleging in his sole point that the evidence was insufficient to establish that he "operated" a motor vehicle while intoxicated. The trial court's judgment is affirmed. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law has been provided to the parties. Missouri Supreme Court Rule 30.25(b)

State v. Sinden, 552 S.W.3d 665 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

552 S.W.3d 665 (State v. Sinden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.