State v. Sinden

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Sinden

552 S.W.3d 665

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 27, 2018

DocketWD 80248

StatusPublished

This text of 552 S.W.3d 665 (State v. Sinden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Sinden, 552 S.W.3d 665 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

*666Roy Wayne Sinden ("Sinden") appeals his conviction for driving while intoxicated under 577.010, alleging in his sole point that the evidence was insufficient to establish that he "operated" a motor vehicle while intoxicated. The trial court's judgment is affirmed. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law has been provided to the parties. Missouri Supreme Court Rule 30.25(b)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

*666Roy Wayne Sinden ("Sinden") appeals his conviction for driving while intoxicated under 577.010, alleging in his sole point that the evidence was insufficient to establish that he "operated" a motor vehicle while intoxicated. The trial court's judgment is affirmed. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law has been provided to the parties. Missouri Supreme Court Rule 30.25(b)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

552 S.W.3d 665, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-sinden-moctapp-2018.