State v. Sinclair
848 P.2d 662, 119 Or. App. 160, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 534
Opinion
Defendant appeals his conviction for burglary in the first degree. ORS 164.225. He contends that the court erred in imposing a sentence under ORS 137.635, rather than under the sentencing guidelines. The state concedes that the court erred. We accept that concession. State v. Haydon, 116 Or App 347, 842 P2d 410 (1992).
Conviction affirmed; sentence vacated; remanded for resentencing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Sinclair, 848 P.2d 662, 119 Or. App. 160, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 534 (Or. Ct. App. 1993).
848 P.2d 662 (State v. Sinclair) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Haydon
842 P.2d 410 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1992)