State v. Sinclair

454 P.2d 858, 253 Or. 453, 1969 Ore. LEXIS 472
Oregon Supreme Court·Decided May 28, 1969·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

*454 PEE CUEIAM.

The .defendant was found guilty of manslaughter by abortion by the trial court sitting without a jury. He contends that there was no evidence to support the trial court’s findings that he was capable of assisting in his own defense and that he was sane as judged by the M’Naghten rule.

This is another case in which the conduct of the defendant was a product of mental illness, in this case schizophrenic reaction, paranoid type. See State v. Van Kleeck, 248 Or 7, 432 P2d 175 (1967). Nevertheless, there was evidence to support the trial court’s findings. Contrary to the defendant’s assertion, the trial court did correctly analyze the medical testimony.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Sinclair, 454 P.2d 858, 253 Or. 453, 1969 Ore. LEXIS 472 (Or. 1969).

454 P.2d 858 (State v. Sinclair) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Lemery
473 P.2d 146 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1970)