State v. Sinclair

163 A.3d 1205, 326 Conn. 904, 2017 WL 2683869, 2017 Conn. LEXIS 181
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedMay 30, 2017
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 163 A.3d 1205 (State v. Sinclair) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Sinclair, 163 A.3d 1205, 326 Conn. 904, 2017 WL 2683869, 2017 Conn. LEXIS 181 (Colo. 2017).

Opinion

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 173 Conn.App. 1, 162 A.3d 43 (2017), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court correctly affirm the judgment of the trial court on the ground that any presumed violation of the defendant's confrontation clause rights was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt?

"2. Did the Appellate Court correctly hold that the trial prosecutor's multiple acts of prosecutorial impropriety did not deprive the defendant of a fair trial?"

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Sinclair
Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2019

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
163 A.3d 1205, 326 Conn. 904, 2017 WL 2683869, 2017 Conn. LEXIS 181, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-sinclair-conn-2017.