State v. Sinclair

163 A.3d 1205, 326 Conn. 904, 2017 WL 2683869, 2017 Conn. LEXIS 181
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided May 30, 2017·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 173 Conn.App. 1, 162 A.3d 43 (2017), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court correctly affirm the judgment of the trial court on the ground that any presumed violation of the defendant's confrontation clause rights was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt?

"2. Did the Appellate Court correctly hold that the trial prosecutor's multiple acts of prosecutorial impropriety did not deprive the defendant of a fair trial?"

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Sinclair, 163 A.3d 1205, 326 Conn. 904, 2017 WL 2683869, 2017 Conn. LEXIS 181 (Colo. 2017).

163 A.3d 1205 (State v. Sinclair) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Sinclair
Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2019