State v. Sinclair
163 A.3d 1205, 326 Conn. 904, 2017 WL 2683869, 2017 Conn. LEXIS 181
Opinion
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court,
"1. Did the Appellate Court correctly affirm the judgment of the trial court on the ground that any presumed violation of the defendant's confrontation clause rights was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt?
"2. Did the Appellate Court correctly hold that the trial prosecutor's multiple acts of prosecutorial impropriety did not deprive the defendant of a fair trial?"
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Sinclair, 163 A.3d 1205, 326 Conn. 904, 2017 WL 2683869, 2017 Conn. LEXIS 181 (Colo. 2017).
163 A.3d 1205 (State v. Sinclair) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Sinclair
Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2019