State v. Sims

1 Tenn. 253
Tennessee Superior Court for Law and Equity·Decided October 6, 1807·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Campbell, J.

requested the prosecutor to be called ; he was and asked if he had any thing to say why the courtshould not discharge the defendant; as his counsel insisted that he had a right to claim his discharge.

Overton, J.

The 9th section of the bill of rights secures to the citizen a speedy, public trial, and to demand the cause of the accusation against him.The state has omitted to provide an attorney general since the resignation of the former one. Upon this man’s demanding the cause of accusation against him, and that he shall have a trial, and there being no reason shewn why he should not, he ougnt to be discharged. The omission of the state to provide a public prosecutor, cannot render the provision of the constitution inefficient ; this circumstance of itself furnishes no ground to keep the prisoner six months longer in confinement.

Campbell, j. and Powel, j. gave no decisive opinion on this ground, but the prisoner was discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Sims, 1 Tenn. 253 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1807).

1 Tenn. 253 (State v. Sims) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Jeffrey Olsen
21 F.4th 1036 (Ninth Circuit, 2022)