State v. Sims

1 Tenn. 253
CourtTennessee Superior Court for Law and Equity
DecidedOctober 6, 1807
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 1 Tenn. 253 (State v. Sims) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Superior Court for Law and Equity primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Sims, 1 Tenn. 253 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1807).

Opinion

Campbell, J.

requested the prosecutor to be called ; he was and asked if he had any thing to say why the courtshould not discharge the defendant; as his counsel insisted that he had a right to claim his discharge.

Overton, J.

The 9th section of the bill of rights secures to the citizen a speedy, public trial, and to demand the cause of the accusation against him.The state has omitted to provide an attorney general since the resignation of the former one. Upon this man’s demanding the cause of accusation against him, and that he shall have a trial, and there being no reason shewn why he should not, he ougnt to be discharged. The omission of the state to provide a public prosecutor, cannot render the provision of the constitution inefficient ; this circumstance of itself furnishes no ground to keep the prisoner six months longer in confinement.

Campbell, j. and Powel, j. gave no decisive opinion on this ground, but the prisoner was discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Jeffrey Olsen
21 F.4th 1036 (Ninth Circuit, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Tenn. 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-sims-tennsuperct-1807.