State v. Simpson

Washington Supreme Court

State v. Simpson

575 P.2d 722, 89 Wash. 2d 803, 1978 Wash. LEXIS 1377

Washington Supreme Court·Decided March 9, 1978·No. No. 45106·Published

Opinion

Dolliver, J.

On April 28, 1976, an information was filed charging the defendants with grand larceny—fraud. On September 21, 1976, finding no waiver by defendants, the trial court dismissed the charge for failure to observe the 90-day time limit under CrR 3.3(b). On December 16, 1976, in State v. Striker, 87 Wn.2d 870, 557 P.2d 847 (1976), we held the CrR 3.3(b) time began to run upon the filing of the information.

Plaintiff persuades us neither that State v. Striker, supra, can be distinguished nor that we should change our position in that case.

Affirmed.

Wright, C.J., and Rosellini, Hamilton, Stafford, Utter, Brachtenbach, Horowitz, and Hicks, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dolliver, J.

On April 28, 1976, an information was filed charging the defendants with grand larceny—fraud. On September 21, 1976, finding no waiver by defendants, the trial court dismissed the charge for failure to observe the 90-day time limit under CrR 3.3(b). On December 16, 1976, in State v. Striker, 87 Wn.2d 870, 557 P.2d 847 (1976), we held the CrR 3.3(b) time began to run upon the filing of the information.

Plaintiff persuades us neither that State v. Striker, supra, can be distinguished nor that we should change our position in that case.

Affirmed.

Wright, C.J., and Rosellini, Hamilton, Stafford, Utter, Brachtenbach, Horowitz, and Hicks, JJ., concur.

State v. Simpson, 575 P.2d 722, 89 Wash. 2d 803, 1978 Wash. LEXIS 1377 (Wash. 1978).

Pincite

575 P.2d 722 (State v. Simpson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related