State v. Simpson
This text of 575 P.2d 722 (State v. Simpson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On April 28, 1976, an information was filed charging the defendants with grand larceny—fraud. On September 21, 1976, finding no waiver by defendants, the trial court dismissed the charge for failure to observe the 90-day time limit under CrR 3.3(b). On December 16, 1976, in State v. Striker, 87 Wn.2d 870, 557 P.2d 847 (1976), we held the CrR 3.3(b) time began to run upon the filing of the information.
Plaintiff persuades us neither that State v. Striker, supra, can be distinguished nor that we should change our position in that case.
Affirmed.
Wright, C.J., and Rosellini, Hamilton, Stafford, Utter, Brachtenbach, Horowitz, and Hicks, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
575 P.2d 722, 89 Wash. 2d 803, 1978 Wash. LEXIS 1377, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-simpson-wash-1978.