State v. Simpson

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Simpson

378 S.W.3d 423, 2012 WL 4355514, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1201

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Simpson. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1330 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 25, 2012·No. No. WD 74354·Published

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM:

Michael Simpson appeals his conviction for the class B misdemeanor of driving while intoxicated, section 577.010. Simpson argues that the trial court plainly erred in overruling his objection to a statement made by the prosecutor during closing argument in that the statement constituted an impermissible comment on Simpson’s decision not to testify and misstated the evidence. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM:

Michael Simpson appeals his conviction for the class B misdemeanor of driving while intoxicated, section 577.010. Simpson argues that the trial court plainly erred in overruling his objection to a statement made by the prosecutor during closing argument in that the statement constituted an impermissible comment on Simpson’s decision not to testify and misstated the evidence. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Simpson, 378 S.W.3d 423, 2012 WL 4355514, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1201 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

378 S.W.3d 423 (State v. Simpson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.