State v. Simpson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

State v. Simpson

561 N.W.2d 181, 1997 Minn. LEXIS 269, 1997 WL 191135

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedApril 10, 1997

DocketNo. C9-96-1856

StatusPublished

This text of 561 N.W.2d 181 (State v. Simpson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Simpson, 561 N.W.2d 181, 1997 Minn. LEXIS 269, 1997 WL 191135 (Mich. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that (1) the petition of Talitha Syntyche Simpson for further review of the unpublished decision of the Court of Appeals filed February 11,1997 be, and the same is, granted and (2) the unpublished decision of the court of appeals is reversed and the matter is remanded to the sentencing court for resentencing, with this court retaining appellate jurisdiction. The trial court made it a condition of probation that petitioner not have any contact with her partner, who is the father of her three children but who also is on parole. The trial [182]*182court is instructed to hold an evidentiary hearing on remand on the issue of the propriety of the condition and to make findings of fact to support its decision retaining or vacating the condition. At the evidentiary hearing both parties should have a right to present evidence relating to the propriety of and need or lack of it for the condition.

Reversed and remanded to trial court with instructions, with this court retaining appellate jurisdiction.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Alexander M. Keith Alexander M. Keith Chief Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that (1) the petition of Talitha Syntyche Simpson for further review of the unpublished decision of the Court of Appeals filed February 11,1997 be, and the same is, granted and (2) the unpublished decision of the court of appeals is reversed and the matter is remanded to the sentencing court for resentencing, with this court retaining appellate jurisdiction. The trial court made it a condition of probation that petitioner not have any contact with her partner, who is the father of her three children but who also is on parole. The trial [182]*182court is instructed to hold an evidentiary hearing on remand on the issue of the propriety of the condition and to make findings of fact to support its decision retaining or vacating the condition. At the evidentiary hearing both parties should have a right to present evidence relating to the propriety of and need or lack of it for the condition.

Reversed and remanded to trial court with instructions, with this court retaining appellate jurisdiction.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Alexander M. Keith Alexander M. Keith Chief Justice

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

561 N.W.2d 181, 1997 Minn. LEXIS 269, 1997 WL 191135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-simpson-minn-1997.