State v. Simpson

Idaho Supreme Court

State v. Simpson

170 P. 1030, 8 Idaho 698, 1902 Ida. LEXIS 65

DecidedDecember 13, 1902

StatusPublished

This text of 170 P. 1030 (State v. Simpson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Simpson, 170 P. 1030, 8 Idaho 698, 1902 Ida. LEXIS 65 (Idaho 1902).

Pincite

Opinion

SHLLIYAN, J.

— In the above-entitled cases, Nos. 818-815, the defendants were convicted of the offense of driving sheep into the state of Idaho in violation of the quarantine law of the state, and appealed to this court. As the identical questions involved in these cases have been considered and decided at this term in the ease of State v. Keller, post, p. 699, 70 Pac. 1051, on the authority of that case, the judgments of the trial courts in the above cases are affirmed. Costs are awarded to the state.

Quarles, C. J., and Stoekslager, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SHLLIYAN, J.

— In the above-entitled cases, Nos. 818-815, the defendants were convicted of the offense of driving sheep into the state of Idaho in violation of the quarantine law of the state, and appealed to this court. As the identical questions involved in these cases have been considered and decided at this term in the ease of State v. Keller, post, p. 699, 70 Pac. 1051, on the authority of that case, the judgments of the trial courts in the above cases are affirmed. Costs are awarded to the state.

Quarles, C. J., and Stoekslager, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

170 P. 1030, 8 Idaho 698, 1902 Ida. LEXIS 65, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-simpson-idaho-1902.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack