State v. Simms

Montana Supreme Court

State v. Simms

41 P. 1003, 17 Mont. 53, 1895 Mont. LEXIS 56

DecidedOctober 14, 1895

StatusPublished

This text of 41 P. 1003 (State v. Simms) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Simms, 41 P. 1003, 17 Mont. 53, 1895 Mont. LEXIS 56 (Mo. 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant was convicted in the district court of the crime of grand larceny. This is an appeal from the judgment. There was no motion in arrest of judgment in the court below. No errors in the judgment have been called to our attention, and we have discovered none. The information is sufficient to support the judgment. The appeal is absolutely without merit. The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The defendant was convicted in the district court of the crime of grand larceny. This is an appeal from the judgment. There was no motion in arrest of judgment in the court below. No errors in the judgment have been called to our attention, and we have discovered none. The information is sufficient to support the judgment. The appeal is absolutely without merit. The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

41 P. 1003, 17 Mont. 53, 1895 Mont. LEXIS 56, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-simms-mont-1895.