State v. Simms
545 A.2d 1102, 208 Conn. 804, 1988 Conn. LEXIS 209
This text of 545 A.2d 1102 (State v. Simms) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Simms, 545 A.2d 1102, 208 Conn. 804, 1988 Conn. LEXIS 209 (Colo. 1988).
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 14 Conn. App. 1, is granted,, limited to the following issue: “Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the transcript of Daniel Jones’ Alford plea was admissible as a prior statement inconsistent with the trial testimony in this case?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Simms
539 A.2d 601 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1988)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
545 A.2d 1102, 208 Conn. 804, 1988 Conn. LEXIS 209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-simms-conn-1988.