State v. Simms

545 A.2d 1102, 208 Conn. 804, 1988 Conn. LEXIS 209
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided May 5, 1988·Published

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 14 Conn. App. 1, is granted,, limited to the following issue: “Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the transcript of Daniel Jones’ Alford plea was admissible as a prior statement inconsistent with the trial testimony in this case?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Simms, 545 A.2d 1102, 208 Conn. 804, 1988 Conn. LEXIS 209 (Colo. 1988).

545 A.2d 1102 (State v. Simms) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Simms
539 A.2d 601 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1988)