State v. Simmons

Court of Appeals of South Carolina·Decided January 16, 2013·No. 2013-UP-017·Unpublished

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Johnnie Simmons, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2011-194607

Appeal From Horry County

Steven H. John, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-017 Submitted December 3, 2012 – Filed January 16, 2013

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender LaNelle Cantey DuRant, of Columbia; and Johnnie Simmons, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor John Gregory Hembree, of Conway, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

FEW, C.J., and WILLIAMS and PIEPER, JJ., concur.

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Simmons, (S.C. Ct. App. 2013).

State v. Simmons (State v. Simmons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)