State v. Simmons

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Simmons

42 So. 582, 118 La. 22, 1906 La. LEXIS 828

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedNovember 26, 1906

DocketNo. 16,233

StatusPublished

Cited by13 cases

This text of 42 So. 582 (State v. Simmons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Simmons, 42 So. 582, 118 La. 22, 1906 La. LEXIS 828 (La. 1906).

Pincite

Opinions

NICHOLLS, J.

The defendant has appealed from the judgment of the district court sentencing him to pay a fine of $325, [23]*23and in default thereof 30 days in the parish jail.

We find in the transcript what purports to he' all the testimony as adduced on the trial. It was not annexed to and made part of a bill of exceptions, and we cannot consider it. No bill of exceptions appears to have been taken. The note found in the body of the testimony given on the trial by the defendant and by witness Baxter, to the effect that certain questions propounded to these witnesses were objected to by the state, that the objection was sustained, and the bill of exception was reserved, is not a bill of exceptions. State v. Comstock, 36 La. Ann. 309; State v. Haines, 51 La. Ann. 731, 25 South. 372, 44 L. R. A. 837; State v. Napoleon, 104 La. 166, 28 South. 972; State ex rel. Markham v. Read, 52 La. Ann. 271, 26 South. 826.

Binding no ground for the reversal of the judgment appealed from, it is hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NICHOLLS, J.

The defendant has appealed from the judgment of the district court sentencing him to pay a fine of $325, [23]*23and in default thereof 30 days in the parish jail.

We find in the transcript what purports to he' all the testimony as adduced on the trial. It was not annexed to and made part of a bill of exceptions, and we cannot consider it. No bill of exceptions appears to have been taken. The note found in the body of the testimony given on the trial by the defendant and by witness Baxter, to the effect that certain questions propounded to these witnesses were objected to by the state, that the objection was sustained, and the bill of exception was reserved, is not a bill of exceptions. State v. Comstock, 36 La. Ann. 309; State v. Haines, 51 La. Ann. 731, 25 South. 372, 44 L. R. A. 837; State v. Napoleon, 104 La. 166, 28 South. 972; State ex rel. Markham v. Read, 52 La. Ann. 271, 26 South. 826.

Binding no ground for the reversal of the judgment appealed from, it is hereby affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

42 So. 582, 118 La. 22, 1906 La. LEXIS 828, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-simmons-la-1906.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack