State v. Simmons

Connecticut Appellate Court

State v. Simmons

539 A.2d 1041, 14 Conn. App. 803, 1988 Conn. App. LEXIS 108

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Simmons. Read the opinion of the Court — 10 Conn. App. 561 →

Connecticut Appellate Court·Decided March 25, 1988·No. 5941·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant, in appealing his conviction, by a jury, of the crimes of criminal mischief in the third degree; General Statutes § 53a-117; interfering with or tampering with an airport or landing field; General Statutes § 15-69; and reckless endangerment in the second degree; General Statutes § 53a-64; has attacked the evidentiary rulings of the trial court.

After a thorough review of the record, transcripts and briefs and after affording those claims of error which are properly before us the appropriate scope of review, we find the defendant’s assertions to be without merit.

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The defendant, in appealing his conviction, by a jury, of the crimes of criminal mischief in the third degree; General Statutes § 53a-117; interfering with or tampering with an airport or landing field; General Statutes § 15-69; and reckless endangerment in the second degree; General Statutes § 53a-64; has attacked the evidentiary rulings of the trial court.

After a thorough review of the record, transcripts and briefs and after affording those claims of error which are properly before us the appropriate scope of review, we find the defendant’s assertions to be without merit.

There is no error.

State v. Simmons, 539 A.2d 1041, 14 Conn. App. 803, 1988 Conn. App. LEXIS 108 (Colo. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

539 A.2d 1041 (State v. Simmons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.