State v. Silvers

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Silvers

212 S.W.3d 206, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 145, 2007 WL 220186

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 30, 2007

DocketWD 66450

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 212 S.W.3d 206 (State v. Silvers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Silvers, 212 S.W.3d 206, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 145, 2007 WL 220186 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

Reginald D. Silvers appeals his conviction for burglary in the second degree under section 569.170 and misdemeanor stealing without consent under section 570.030, RSMo 2000. He argues that the State impermissibly used hearsay evidence against him causing him to suffer prejudice affecting his substantial rights. He claims that permitting the use of such *207 evidence would amount to a miscarriage of justice.

Affirmed. Rule 80.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM.

Reginald D. Silvers appeals his conviction for burglary in the second degree under section 569.170 and misdemeanor stealing without consent under section 570.030, RSMo 2000. He argues that the State impermissibly used hearsay evidence against him causing him to suffer prejudice affecting his substantial rights. He claims that permitting the use of such *207 evidence would amount to a miscarriage of justice.

Affirmed. Rule 80.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

212 S.W.3d 206, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 145, 2007 WL 220186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-silvers-moctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack