State v. Silvers

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Silvers

212 S.W.3d 206, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 145, 2007 WL 220186

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 30, 2007·No. WD 66450·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

Reginald D. Silvers appeals his conviction for burglary in the second degree under section 569.170 and misdemeanor stealing without consent under section 570.030, RSMo 2000. He argues that the State impermissibly used hearsay evidence against him causing him to suffer prejudice affecting his substantial rights. He claims that permitting the use of such *207 evidence would amount to a miscarriage of justice.

Affirmed. Rule 80.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM.

Reginald D. Silvers appeals his conviction for burglary in the second degree under section 569.170 and misdemeanor stealing without consent under section 570.030, RSMo 2000. He argues that the State impermissibly used hearsay evidence against him causing him to suffer prejudice affecting his substantial rights. He claims that permitting the use of such *207 evidence would amount to a miscarriage of justice.

Affirmed. Rule 80.25(b).

State v. Silvers, 212 S.W.3d 206, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 145, 2007 WL 220186 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

212 S.W.3d 206 (State v. Silvers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related