State v. Silverman

859 N.E.2d 557, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1418
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 27, 2006·No. 2006-1687·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Franklin App. Nos. 05AP-837, 05AP-838 and 05AP-839, 2006-Ohio-3826. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. I; cause held for the decision in 2006-1245 and 2006-1383, State v. Payne, Franklin App. No. 05AP-517, 2006-Ohio-2552; and briefing schedule stayed.

Lundberg Stratton, J., would also accept the appeal on all other Propositions of Law. Pfeifer, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Silverman, 859 N.E.2d 557, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1418 (Ohio 2006).

859 N.E.2d 557 (State v. Silverman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Silverman, 06ap-1278 (12-6-2007)
2007 Ohio 6498 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2007)