State v. Silverman

183 A. 178, 116 N.J.L. 242, 1936 N.J. LEXIS 241
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJanuary 31, 1936
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 183 A. 178 (State v. Silverman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Silverman, 183 A. 178, 116 N.J.L. 242, 1936 N.J. LEXIS 241 (N.J. 1936).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review heroin should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Lloyd in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Case, Bobine, Heheb, Peeskie, Heteield, Deae, Wells, WolesKeil Raeeeety, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State of New Jersey v. Gray
244 A.2d 703 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1968)
State v. Nicastro
125 A.2d 433 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1956)
Territory of Hawaii v. Lerner
36 Haw. 244 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1942)
State v. Pruser
21 A.2d 641 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
183 A. 178, 116 N.J.L. 242, 1936 N.J. LEXIS 241, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-silverman-nj-1936.