State v. Silverman
183 A. 178, 116 N.J.L. 242, 1936 N.J. LEXIS 241
Opinion
The judgment under review heroin should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Lloyd in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Case, Bobine, Heheb, Peeskie, Heteield, Deae, Wells, WolesKeil Raeeeety, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Silverman, 183 A. 178, 116 N.J.L. 242, 1936 N.J. LEXIS 241 (N.J. 1936).
183 A. 178 (State v. Silverman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State of New Jersey v. Gray
244 A.2d 703 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1968)
State v. Nicastro
125 A.2d 433 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1956)
Territory of Hawaii v. Lerner
36 Haw. 244 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1942)
State v. Pruser
21 A.2d 641 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1941)