State v. Silver

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Silver

456 S.W.3d 860, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1360, 2014 WL 6923086

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 9, 2014·No. No. ED 100665·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Fred Silver appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of attempted forcible sodomy, ■ kidnapping, and second-degree child molestation. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the State presented sufficient evidence to support the trial court’s judgment. State v. Jordan, 181 S.W.3d 588, 592 (Mo.App.E.D.2005). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Fred Silver appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of attempted forcible sodomy, ■ kidnapping, and second-degree child molestation. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the State presented sufficient evidence to support the trial court’s judgment. State v. Jordan, 181 S.W.3d 588, 592 (Mo.App.E.D.2005). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

State v. Silver, 456 S.W.3d 860, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1360, 2014 WL 6923086 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

456 S.W.3d 860 (State v. Silver) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related