State v. Silinzy

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Silinzy

157 S.W.3d 326, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 286, 2005 WL 406033

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 22, 2005

DocketED 84206

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 157 S.W.3d 326 (State v. Silinzy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Silinzy, 157 S.W.3d 326, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 286, 2005 WL 406033 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Gary Michael Silinzy (“defendant”) appeals the judgment on his conviction of one count of assault in the first degree, one count of armed criminal action, one count of first degree burglary, and one count of assault in the third degree. Defendant claims that the trial court erred in allowing the state to elicit evidence of the prior convictions of Cornelius Prince and Kiana Warren on direct examination.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI