State v. Signal
242 So. 2d 889, 257 La. 560, 1971 La. LEXIS 4640
Opinion
Not considered. Because the appellate delays have expired, La.C.Cr.P. art. 914, [561]*561we will not exercise our supervisory jurisdiction. Borah v. Dussel, 153 La. 54, 95 So. 399 (1923); Cloud v. Bushnell, 168 So.2d 274 (La.App.3d cir. 1964), and the opinions of this Court collected therein.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Signal, 242 So. 2d 889, 257 La. 560, 1971 La. LEXIS 4640 (La. 1971).
242 So. 2d 889 (State v. Signal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Triche v. City of Houma
342 So. 2d 1155 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1977)