State v. Sifrit

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Sifrit

511 S.W.3d 431, 2017 WL 765915, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 498

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 28, 2017·No. No. 103911·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Michael Sifrit (“Appellant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment convicting him of four counts of receiving stolen property, in violation of Section 570.080 (RSMo. 2000). Appellant was sentenced to concurrent sentences of seven years of imprisonment for each count. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Michael Sifrit (“Appellant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment convicting him of four counts of receiving stolen property, in violation of Section 570.080 (RSMo. 2000). Appellant was sentenced to concurrent sentences of seven years of imprisonment for each count. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Sifrit, 511 S.W.3d 431, 2017 WL 765915, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 498 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

511 S.W.3d 431 (State v. Sifrit) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.