Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State v. Siferd

State v. Siferd

786 N.E.2d 900, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1537
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedApril 23, 2003
Docket2003-0106
StatusPublished

This text of 786 N.E.2d 900 (State v. Siferd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Siferd, 786 N.E.2d 900, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1537 (Ohio 2003).

Opinion

Hancock App. No. 5-02-09, 2002-Ohio-6801. Discretionary appeal allowed on Proposition of Law No. X; sua sponte, cause held for the decision in 2002-0201, State v. Fisher, Franklin App. No. 01AP-614, 2001-Ohio-8772; briefing schedule stayed.

Resnick, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., would also allow all other propositions of law. F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
786 N.E.2d 900, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1537, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-siferd-ohio-2003.