State v. Siegfried Corp.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

State v. Siegfried Corp.

347 S.E.2d 499, 82 N.C. App. 678, 1986 N.C. App. LEXIS 2599

CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina

DecidedSeptember 2, 1986

DocketNo. 8626SC138

StatusPublished

This text of 347 S.E.2d 499 (State v. Siegfried Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Siegfried Corp., 347 S.E.2d 499, 82 N.C. App. 678, 1986 N.C. App. LEXIS 2599 (N.C. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

HEDRICK, Chief Judge.

Defendants have appealed from the following interlocutory orders: 1) Orders entered 30 September 1985 ordering defendants 1054 Charlotte, Inc.; Eighty-Nine Forty-One East Independence, Inc.; 6101 Wilkinson Boulevard, Inc.; and Cinema Blue of Charlotte, Inc. to produce documents and things requested by plaintiff; 2) orders entered 3 October 1985 denying all defendants’ motions to suppress evidence; and 3) orders entered 3 October 1985 denying all defendants’ motions to dismiss for lack of a prior adversary hearing. The record on appeal was filed in this Court on 3 February 1986. After briefs were filed, plaintiff, appellee made a motion to dismiss the appeal on the grounds that no appeal lies from these interlocutory orders. Ruling on the motion to dismiss was referred to the panel to which the case is assigned.

The case was assigned to this panel and calendared for hearing on the date listed above. This appeal is dismissed as being from interlocutory orders not affecting a substantial right.

Appeal dismissed; writ of supersedeas and temporary stay dissolved, and the cause is remanded to the superior court for further proceedings.

Judges Webb and Wells concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HEDRICK, Chief Judge.

Defendants have appealed from the following interlocutory orders: 1) Orders entered 30 September 1985 ordering defendants 1054 Charlotte, Inc.; Eighty-Nine Forty-One East Independence, Inc.; 6101 Wilkinson Boulevard, Inc.; and Cinema Blue of Charlotte, Inc. to produce documents and things requested by plaintiff; 2) orders entered 3 October 1985 denying all defendants’ motions to suppress evidence; and 3) orders entered 3 October 1985 denying all defendants’ motions to dismiss for lack of a prior adversary hearing. The record on appeal was filed in this Court on 3 February 1986. After briefs were filed, plaintiff, appellee made a motion to dismiss the appeal on the grounds that no appeal lies from these interlocutory orders. Ruling on the motion to dismiss was referred to the panel to which the case is assigned.

The case was assigned to this panel and calendared for hearing on the date listed above. This appeal is dismissed as being from interlocutory orders not affecting a substantial right.

Appeal dismissed; writ of supersedeas and temporary stay dissolved, and the cause is remanded to the superior court for further proceedings.

Judges Webb and Wells concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

347 S.E.2d 499, 82 N.C. App. 678, 1986 N.C. App. LEXIS 2599, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-siegfried-corp-ncctapp-1986.