State v. Siddal

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Siddal

728 So. 2d 363, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 3428, 1999 WL 157087

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 24, 1999

DocketNo. 98-1354

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 728 So. 2d 363 (State v. Siddal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Siddal, 728 So. 2d 363, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 3428, 1999 WL 157087 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Although we understand the trial court’s intentions in imposing a downward departure sentence, the State’s position is correct and the downward departure is not legally sustainable. As a consequence, we reverse the trial court’s order and remand for resentenc-ing within the sentencing guidelines. See State v. Whiting, 711 So.2d 1212 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998).

Reversed and remanded for resentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Although we understand the trial court’s intentions in imposing a downward departure sentence, the State’s position is correct and the downward departure is not legally sustainable. As a consequence, we reverse the trial court’s order and remand for resentenc-ing within the sentencing guidelines. See State v. Whiting, 711 So.2d 1212 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998).

Reversed and remanded for resentencing.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

728 So. 2d 363, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 3428, 1999 WL 157087, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-siddal-fladistctapp-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack