State v. Siciliano
91 A. 988, 85 N.J.L. 389, 56 Vroom 389, 1913 N.J. LEXIS 306
Opinion
The j udgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons set. forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Yoorhees, Minturn, Kalisch, Yredenburgh, Congdon, White, Ter-HUNE, HePPENHETMISR, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Siciliano, 91 A. 988, 85 N.J.L. 389, 56 Vroom 389, 1913 N.J. LEXIS 306 (N.J. 1913).
91 A. 988 (State v. Siciliano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jackson v. State
5 A.2d 282 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1939)