State v. Sicilia

Court of Appeals of Washington

State v. Sicilia

472 P.2d 415, 2 Wash. App. 636, 1970 Wash. App. LEXIS 1175

CourtCourt of Appeals of Washington

DecidedMay 6, 1970

DocketNo. 73-41211-2

StatusPublished

This text of 472 P.2d 415 (State v. Sicilia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Sicilia, 472 P.2d 415, 2 Wash. App. 636, 1970 Wash. App. LEXIS 1175 (Wash. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam

Defendant appeals from a conviction of escape from custody. His appointed counsel has made a motion to withdraw contending that the appeal is frivolous. In accordance with the rule of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967), and State v. Koehler, 73 Wn.2d 145, 436 P.2d 773 (1968), his counsel has submitted a brief setting forth issues he considers to arguably support the appeal. Counsel concluded that these issues are without merit. The state has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the grounds that it is frivolous and without arguable merit under authority of Anders, Koehler and CAROA 51.

We have examined the entire record, the brief of defendant’s appointed counsel and defendant’s pro se brief previously submitted and are also led to the conclusion that the appeal is patently frivolous.

The motion of defendant’s counsel to withdraw and the state’s motion to dismiss are granted.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam

Defendant appeals from a conviction of escape from custody. His appointed counsel has made a motion to withdraw contending that the appeal is frivolous. In accordance with the rule of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967), and State v. Koehler, 73 Wn.2d 145, 436 P.2d 773 (1968), his counsel has submitted a brief setting forth issues he considers to arguably support the appeal. Counsel concluded that these issues are without merit. The state has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the grounds that it is frivolous and without arguable merit under authority of Anders, Koehler and CAROA 51.

We have examined the entire record, the brief of defendant’s appointed counsel and defendant’s pro se brief previously submitted and are also led to the conclusion that the appeal is patently frivolous.

The motion of defendant’s counsel to withdraw and the state’s motion to dismiss are granted.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

472 P.2d 415, 2 Wash. App. 636, 1970 Wash. App. LEXIS 1175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-sicilia-washctapp-1970.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack