State v. Shumpert

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Shumpert

789 S.W.2d 885, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 822, 1990 WL 71565

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 29, 1990·No. No. 54431·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from denial of his post-conviction Rule 29.15 motion seeking to set aside his conviction and sentence of ten years for sodomy. The motion was based on ineffectiveness of counsel. We find no error in the court’s denial of the motion, that the judgment is based upon findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that an opinion would have no precedential value. A statement in support of our conclusion has been furnished to the parties. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from denial of his post-conviction Rule 29.15 motion seeking to set aside his conviction and sentence of ten years for sodomy. The motion was based on ineffectiveness of counsel. We find no error in the court’s denial of the motion, that the judgment is based upon findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that an opinion would have no precedential value. A statement in support of our conclusion has been furnished to the parties. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

State v. Shumpert, 789 S.W.2d 885, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 822, 1990 WL 71565 (Mo. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

789 S.W.2d 885 (State v. Shumpert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.