State v. Shrewsbury

8 Vt. 223
Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided February 15, 1836·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Williams. Cb. J.

The town of Shrewsbury are indicted for not opening a road, laid out by the road commissioners. On trial they offered to prove in defence, that the road had been discontinued by the select men of the town. The evidence was rejected by the county court, and we think the evidence was inadmissible. The select men have no authority to discontinue roads laid out by the road commissioners, a committee of the legislation, or a committee appointed by the supreme or county court.'

There must, therefore, be judgment on the verdict.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Shrewsbury, 8 Vt. 223 (Vt. 1836).

8 Vt. 223 (State v. Shrewsbury) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Town of Shrewsbury v. Davis
142 A. 91 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1928)