State v. Showers

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Showers

666 So. 2d 654, 1996 La. LEXIS 261, 1996 WL 42552

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedFebruary 2, 1996

DocketNo. 94-KA-2076

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 666 So. 2d 654 (State v. Showers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Showers, 666 So. 2d 654, 1996 La. LEXIS 261, 1996 WL 42552 (La. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The instant appeal stems from an order of appeal signed in the district court before July 1, 1982. See La. Const, art. 5, § 5 (as amended by Act No. 843 of 1980, eff. July 1, 1982). Following a fourteen-year delay, the appeal of defendant’s conviction and sentence for armed robbery, La.R.S. 14:64, was lodged in this Court. The record was reviewed and a tentative determination made to place the case on the summary docket for summary disposition. See State v. Duhon, 340 So.2d 151 (On rehearing). After considering the merits of the defendant’s claims made by counsel in brief and during oral argument, we conclude that none of his seven assignments of error has merit and that a written opinion “would add little to the jurisprudence of this state.” Id., 340 So.2d at 152. Accordingly, the defendant’s conviction and sentence are affirmed.

CONVICTION AND SENTENCE AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The instant appeal stems from an order of appeal signed in the district court before July 1, 1982. See La. Const, art. 5, § 5 (as amended by Act No. 843 of 1980, eff. July 1, 1982). Following a fourteen-year delay, the appeal of defendant’s conviction and sentence for armed robbery, La.R.S. 14:64, was lodged in this Court. The record was reviewed and a tentative determination made to place the case on the summary docket for summary disposition. See State v. Duhon, 340 So.2d 151 (On rehearing). After considering the merits of the defendant’s claims made by counsel in brief and during oral argument, we conclude that none of his seven assignments of error has merit and that a written opinion “would add little to the jurisprudence of this state.” Id., 340 So.2d at 152. Accordingly, the defendant’s conviction and sentence are affirmed.

CONVICTION AND SENTENCE AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

666 So. 2d 654, 1996 La. LEXIS 261, 1996 WL 42552, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-showers-la-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack