State v. Short

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

David Wayne Short, Appellant.

---

Appeal From Darlington County
 James E. Lockemy, Circuit Court Judge

---

Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-311
Submitted June 1, 2010 – Filed June 15, 2010

---

Affirmed

---

Appellate Defender M. Celia Robinson, of Columbia, for Appellant.

J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  David Wayne Short appeals the revocation of his probation arguing the imposition of a further term of community supervision violated his right to due process and deprived him of the constitutional protections guaranteed all criminal defendants.  We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authority: See State v. Shumate, 276 S.C. 46, 47, 275 S.E.2d 288, 288 (1981) (holing a defendant's failure "to object to or seek modification of the revocation sentence in the trial court" precludes challenging the sentence on appeal).

Affirmed.

FEW, C.J., WILLIAMS, J., and CURETON, A.J., concur.

---

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.