State v. Sholedice
386 P.3d 701, 283 Or. App. 346, 2017 Ore. App. LEXIS 3
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedJanuary 5, 2017
Docket141765; A158781
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 386 P.3d 701 (State v. Sholedice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Sholedice, 386 P.3d 701, 283 Or. App. 346, 2017 Ore. App. LEXIS 3 (Or. Ct. App. 2017).
Opinion
Reversed and remanded. State v. Barnthouse, 271 Or App 312, 350 P3d 536 (2015), aff’d on other grounds, 360 Or 403, 380 P3d 952 (2016) (holding that, for purposes of Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution, law enforcement illegally seized a package by removing it from the stream of mail and submitting it to a dog sniff).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Sholedice
431 P.3d 386 (Oregon Supreme Court, 2018)
State v. Smith
387 P.3d 499 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2017)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
386 P.3d 701, 283 Or. App. 346, 2017 Ore. App. LEXIS 3, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-sholedice-orctapp-2017.